The Tennessee Court of Appeals recently issued its decision Surber v. Mountain States Health Alliance d/b/a Johnson City Medical Center, No. E2019-01494-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2020). The syllabus from the slip opinion reads:
This is a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff filed suit against the hospital for treatment he received following an eye injury, raising claims of direct and vicarious liability. The case proceeded to a jury trial, at which the court granted a directed verdict on the claim of direct liability at the close of the plaintiff’s proof. The plaintiff filed this appeal, claiming the trial court erred in limiting his expert witness testimony. We affirm.
The link to the majority opinion is here:
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/surber_v._mountain_states_e2019-01494.pdf
Judge Swiney's concurring opinion is here:
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/surber_v._mountain_states_e2019-01494_b.pdf
NOTE: This case offers a good discussion of direct hospital liability under a negligence theory. This difference between this case and Barkes v. River Park Hospital, Inc., 328 S.W.3d. 829 (Tenn. 2010) is explained herein: it is nuanced, but worth noting: the standard of care is not the same thing as hospital rules and regulations (although the rules and regulations can be in accord with the standard of care required of a hospital).
No comments:
Post a Comment